A Down Payment on Development

A Down Payment on Development: Conclude a WTO Trade Facilitation Deal

We are now in the fourth year of the Great Recession.  So far, the economies belonging to the World Trade Organization (WTO) have resisted the kind of widespread protectionism that would make a bad situation much worse.  But protectionist pressures are building as weary politicians hear more and more calls for economic nationalism.
The WTO’s best defense of open trade is a good offense.  A new WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement would be a win-win for all: increasing developing countries’ capacity to trade, strengthening the WTO’s development mandate, and helping fuel global economic growth.  More than a decade after the launch of the Doha Round, this agreement could be a down payment on the commitment WTO members have made to linking trade and development.

Developing countries stand to gain the most from improving trade facilitation.  The right support will help traders in poorer countries compete and integrate into global supply chains.  There are rich opportunities for gains.  Inefficiencies in processing and clearing goods put traders in developing countries at a competitive disadvantage.  Outdated and inefficient border procedures and inadequate infrastructure often mean high transaction costs, long delays, opportunities for corruption, and an additional 10 to 15 percent to the cost of getting goods to market — even more in landlocked countries.

World Bank research suggests that for every dollar of assistance provided to support trade facilitation reform in developing countries, there is a return of up to $70 in economic benefits.  A significant impact occurs when funds are directed at improving border management systems and procedures: the very issues covered by the trade facilitation negotiations.

Efficiency and transparency projects supported by development banks and bi-lateral donors have made a dramatic difference.  In East Africa, procedural improvements reduced the average clearance time for cargo crossing the Kenya-Uganda border from almost two days to only 7 hours.  In Cameroon, some of our organizations have worked with the World Customs Organization to help the customs authority reduce corruption and increase collection of revenues – estimated to be over $25 million a year.

On the Lao-Vietnam border, a sub-regional cross-border transport agreement has cut cargo transit times from four hours to just over one hour.  A new customs component to a highway project between Phnom Penh and Ho Chi Minh City helped increase the total value of trade through the Moc Bai-Bavet border by 40 percent over three years.   In Peru, some of our Banks have worked with international freight forwarders to connect rural, remote villages and small businesses to export markets through national postal services resulting in more than 300 small firms becoming exporters, most for the first time.

The outlines of a new WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement are already clear, but some technical differences remain on the specific provisions. Developing countries want a credible commitment to support implementation costs such as technical assistance and capacity building.  A World Bank study estimates that the costs of implementing the measures likely to be covered by a Trade Facilitation agreement would be relatively modest – $7 to $11 million in the countries studied, spread out over a number of years – especially when compared to the expected benefits.

Capacity building and financing programs for governments wanting to improve their trade facilitation are available already.  Major donor countries and international development organizations have put a priority on, and increased investment in, trade facilitation.  According to the OECD, trade facilitation-related assistance has increased ten-fold, in real terms, from almost $40 million in 2002 to near $400 million in 2010.

To assist developing countries through the process of full and effective implementation of the agreement, we stand ready – alongside the WTO – to help countries assess their trade facilitation needs on a case-by-case basis, match those needs with the resources required, and broker partnerships between recipient countries and development partners to ensure that support is provided quickly and efficiently.

In international negotiations, there is always a way forward if the benefits from securing an agreement are shared by all.  Trade facilitation offers a development dividend for all countries.  It is time for WTO members to make progress on issues where there is room to do so.  It will be a down payment on a solid investment.

•  Ahmad Mohamed Ali Al-Madani, President of the Islamic Development Bank
•  Donald Kaberuka, President of the African Development Bank
•  Haruhiko Kuroda, President of the Asian Development Bank
•  Thomas Mirow, President of the European Bank for  Reconstruction and Development
•  Luis Alberto Moreno, President of the InterAmerican Development Bank
•  Robert B. Zoellick, President of the World Bank Group